sk.aggarwal
01-16 03:32 AM
I have filed for the 7nth year extension based on my pending labor (365 days old). The perm is picked up for an audit. Incase if the perm is denied, will h1b also be rejected ?
As per my understanding, your H1 will not be denied but you will not be eligible for any subsequent extensions unless at that time you have one more perm pending for over 1 yr or I-140 approved.
I would recommend you find another employer or file perm through some one else as future employee. 30% perms in audit are denied after 2 yrs wait.
As per my understanding, your H1 will not be denied but you will not be eligible for any subsequent extensions unless at that time you have one more perm pending for over 1 yr or I-140 approved.
I would recommend you find another employer or file perm through some one else as future employee. 30% perms in audit are denied after 2 yrs wait.
wallpaper Shoes for 2011 Fashion Trends
ItIsNotFunny
04-13 02:05 PM
By clicking the below link please send emails to your senators, all you need is to give your contact info and the email will be sent to the corresponding senators in your area.
http://capwiz.com/aila2/issues/alert/?alertid=9615496
I called NJ senators. Their staff just listened, didn't give any remarks from them ;)
http://capwiz.com/aila2/issues/alert/?alertid=9615496
I called NJ senators. Their staff just listened, didn't give any remarks from them ;)
Blog Feeds
10-04 11:10 PM
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus has sent a letter to the President asking him to terminate the controversial 287(g) program that allows local police to enforce immigration laws on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security. The CHC expressed its concerns about allegations of serious civil rights violations against Hispanics as well as recent reports of poor oversight in the program. The National Council of La Raza, the country's largest Latino civil rights organization praised the letter.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/conressional-hispanics-call-for-president-to-scrap-287g-program.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/conressional-hispanics-call-for-president-to-scrap-287g-program.html)
2011 Wedding Dresses 2011 Trends
Legal
07-24 04:30 PM
I see lot of excitement about asking USCIS about filing for I-485
even when visa numbers are unavailable. I am afraid this may
not work.
The ombudsman report 2005 was very critical about temporary EADs being issued to "potential terrorists" without proper background check. Filing for I-485 and getting EAD is like a limbo state btween GC and H1B. This approach may not gain much support.
(1) How about proposing that they should do FBI name check with I-140?
This is the petition for immigrant visa.
(2) Those who have approved I-140 but haven't filed for I485 due to
retrogression can apply for FBI name check separately.
(3) These added "security measures" will boost our chances of getting them OK to file for I-485 even when PD is not current.
p.s
the argument that FBI name check is valid only for a breif period is stupid, but it may be forthcoming. The response is what if some one commits terrorism 6 months after getting GC:D
even when visa numbers are unavailable. I am afraid this may
not work.
The ombudsman report 2005 was very critical about temporary EADs being issued to "potential terrorists" without proper background check. Filing for I-485 and getting EAD is like a limbo state btween GC and H1B. This approach may not gain much support.
(1) How about proposing that they should do FBI name check with I-140?
This is the petition for immigrant visa.
(2) Those who have approved I-140 but haven't filed for I485 due to
retrogression can apply for FBI name check separately.
(3) These added "security measures" will boost our chances of getting them OK to file for I-485 even when PD is not current.
p.s
the argument that FBI name check is valid only for a breif period is stupid, but it may be forthcoming. The response is what if some one commits terrorism 6 months after getting GC:D
more...
Blog Feeds
07-29 06:20 PM
Robert Creamer has an interesting analysis of how the ruling in Arizona could affect the Democrats' prospects in November. Many pundits are assuming that Republicans benefit. But Creamer makes a point I've said here many times. The only voters who switch their votes on the immigration issue are Hispanics. Anti-immigrants NEVER vote for the Democrats anyway. They almost always have a host of issues that they care about and in most cases the GOP is the better fit for those voters. So Democrats who try and pander to the Tea Party types are wasting their time.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/why-the-arizona-ruling-is-good-for-democrats.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/why-the-arizona-ruling-is-good-for-democrats.html)
hary_s123
02-09 01:40 PM
My wife switched from H4 to F1 status and is near completion of her Masters degree.
She will be traveling to India soon and will be getting her F1 visa stamped.
Documents/advice from anyone who has done this recently will be appreciated.
welcome any suggestions/pointers in this regard.
She will be traveling to India soon and will be getting her F1 visa stamped.
Documents/advice from anyone who has done this recently will be appreciated.
welcome any suggestions/pointers in this regard.
more...
ss2005
03-09 04:09 PM
Hi Gurus,
I am planning to invoke AC21 thru H1 Transfer and then notify upon H1approval.
Do we need to make sure while filing H1 transfer, job duties on H1/LC should exactly match Labour Cert job duties?
I know while notifying it has to match.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
SS.
PD 2007
140 Approved
485 > 180 days
EB2 - IND
I am planning to invoke AC21 thru H1 Transfer and then notify upon H1approval.
Do we need to make sure while filing H1 transfer, job duties on H1/LC should exactly match Labour Cert job duties?
I know while notifying it has to match.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks,
SS.
PD 2007
140 Approved
485 > 180 days
EB2 - IND
2010 Shoes Trends Autumn / Winter
Blog Feeds
03-27 11:30 AM
Peri Software Solutions Inc., a New Jersey-based software company, has recently been cited by the Department of Labor for wage law violations in connection with 163 H-1B visa employees. The company is accused of not paying prevailing wages to its H-1B workers, most of whom are software and technology analysts. Under H-1B regulations, employers are required file a Labor Condition Application (LCA) as part of the H-1B petition for immigrant workers. By doing so, the employer agrees to pay the employee a wage equal to or greater than the prevailing wage specified in the LCA. This wage must be paid...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/03/alleged-h-1b-abuse-in-the-limelight.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2010/03/alleged-h-1b-abuse-in-the-limelight.html)
more...
vedicman
04-27 03:31 PM
Hey guys, I am planning on getting my in-laws this summer or early fall. What are the papers I need to be sending? Thanks for your advice in advance.
hair FASHION TRENDS 2011-2012
pappu
12-07 09:06 PM
i did send the fax. Was reading news and thought i should make a post.
if you have sent the fax, pls start making phone calls. there are several lawmakers to call
if you have sent the fax, pls start making phone calls. there are several lawmakers to call
more...
Blog Feeds
07-29 06:10 AM
On July 28, Federal District Court Judge Susan Bolton granted a preliminary injunction against major sections of Arizona�s new immigration law which were scheduled to become effective the following day. In a 36-page decision, Judge Bolton found that the United States is �likely to succeed on the merits in showing that the following sections of S.B.1070 are preempted by Federal law�: * �requiring that an officer make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested if there is a reasonable suspicion that the person is unlawfully present in the United States, and requiring...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/07/judge-overturns-arizona-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/07/judge-overturns-arizona-law.html)
hot Fashion Shoes for Girls
aqua
01-29 09:01 AM
Hello,
I am completing 4 yrs of my H1 and currenty working with company. I already have my PERM & 140 cleared through this company (EB3).
Hence, if I continue with this company, I do not have to worry about 6yrs limit on my H1.
However, if I have to change my employer:
1. Now?
2. After completion of 6 yrs (i.e. H1 extensions) would I be able to do that?
Also, what will happen with my GC? Will that be fresh start from scratch?
I am completing 4 yrs of my H1 and currenty working with company. I already have my PERM & 140 cleared through this company (EB3).
Hence, if I continue with this company, I do not have to worry about 6yrs limit on my H1.
However, if I have to change my employer:
1. Now?
2. After completion of 6 yrs (i.e. H1 extensions) would I be able to do that?
Also, what will happen with my GC? Will that be fresh start from scratch?
more...
house Latest Shoes Trends 2011
madooripraveen
03-25 01:52 PM
On March 12 2009 I got an query on my I-485.
Requesting discrepancy in the labor applied on Nov'7 2002 and present working place.
My company(abc ltd) applied labor on Nov'07 2002 while I was working at the clients(xyz) place in Los Angeles.
I got my I-140 approved on Feb'15 2006, while I was with the same client(xyz) at that time.
On Dec'04 2006 I moved to Detroit, started working with different client.
RFE goes like this.
The Documentation submitted with your application and/or a review of service records indicate that you no longer reside in the same state or geographical location as the underlying form i-140 immigration petitioner and /or job location specified by your intended permanent employer.
There fore submit a currently dated letter from your original form I-140 employer which which address this discrepancy.
I am still working with the same employer who filed my labor certification.
Any gurus who can suggest me on the query would be greatly appreciated.
Requesting discrepancy in the labor applied on Nov'7 2002 and present working place.
My company(abc ltd) applied labor on Nov'07 2002 while I was working at the clients(xyz) place in Los Angeles.
I got my I-140 approved on Feb'15 2006, while I was with the same client(xyz) at that time.
On Dec'04 2006 I moved to Detroit, started working with different client.
RFE goes like this.
The Documentation submitted with your application and/or a review of service records indicate that you no longer reside in the same state or geographical location as the underlying form i-140 immigration petitioner and /or job location specified by your intended permanent employer.
There fore submit a currently dated letter from your original form I-140 employer which which address this discrepancy.
I am still working with the same employer who filed my labor certification.
Any gurus who can suggest me on the query would be greatly appreciated.
tattoo shoes trend winter 2011 Shoes
mani_veeras@yahoo.com
02-25 05:05 PM
Hi,
I am curently on h1b visa on 7th year.My i-140 got approved 3years back and filed i-485 in 2007 and waiting for gc.Now if i switch my job to different employer using my EAD,Can my previous employer revoke my i-140 affecting my gc processing.Does he still have control to withdraw.Can you please help on this.Thanks.
I am curently on h1b visa on 7th year.My i-140 got approved 3years back and filed i-485 in 2007 and waiting for gc.Now if i switch my job to different employer using my EAD,Can my previous employer revoke my i-140 affecting my gc processing.Does he still have control to withdraw.Can you please help on this.Thanks.
more...
pictures Nike Shoes Trends 2011
pappu
04-13 02:32 PM
I have some experience and my wife has some.(We already have got our gc but I am glad to help)
drak70
Thanks
Pls send a PM or email to pdakwala
drak70
Thanks
Pls send a PM or email to pdakwala
dresses Shoes-trends-young-girls
Blog Feeds
09-02 10:10 PM
Pew confirms what we've already assumed is happening. The number of illegally present immigrants has dropped 8% since 2007. The number is now about 11 million, down from peaking at 12 million. The annual migration of illegally present immigrants has dropped from about 850,000 a year a few years ago to just 300,000 a year today. Why? Probably a combination of a lousy economy and much more vigorous enforcement, particularly at the border. Here is the report for your viewing pleasure: pew hispanic study 08-2010 -
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/pew-study-illegal-immigraton-down-sharply.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/09/pew-study-illegal-immigraton-down-sharply.html)
more...
makeup Shoes trends for 2011
yganreddy
09-16 12:19 AM
You can do it for your friends if you can able to support them while they are in US.
Can we sponsor visitor visa for friends or is it only for relatives?.
Can we sponsor visitor visa for friends or is it only for relatives?.
girlfriend FASHION TRENDS 2011-2012
ChalapathiChitturi
11-01 05:30 AM
Your I-485 will not go forward unti they receive the 140 approval.
I-485 petition will be undated automatically as soon as the corresponding I-140 is approved.
As far as I know, you don't have to inform uscis about your I-140 approval.
I-485 petition will be undated automatically as soon as the corresponding I-140 is approved.
As far as I know, you don't have to inform uscis about your I-140 approval.
hairstyles Spring 2011 Shoe Trends
needGCcool
07-23 02:52 PM
Not yet.. lot of threads....with same information......:eek:
vina92
11-30 08:27 PM
I have a question regarding location change with same employer. I have labor approved on EB2 India with PD 01/2005. I am employed with a big health care firm which has various locations in the region. I'd like to move to another location which is 30 miles away from my present site. I140 is pending with the same employer. I have also posed this question to my lawyer but appreciate greatly if anyone knows answer to this. Will this affect my GC?
Dhundhun
01-13 05:12 PM
I applied AP around same time and got it couple of days ago.
Check not cashed is indication of missing mail, either by mailing services (USPS, FEDEX, ...) or in USCIS. Average time for check to be cashed is less than 10 days.
Whether you should open SR or re-apply, someone who faced similar situation can provide better answer.
Check not cashed is indication of missing mail, either by mailing services (USPS, FEDEX, ...) or in USCIS. Average time for check to be cashed is less than 10 days.
Whether you should open SR or re-apply, someone who faced similar situation can provide better answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment